Teachers' Domain is moving soon to its new and improved home — PBS LearningMedia!          Learn More

NASA Chamber of Horrors

Resource for Grades 9-12

NASA's Spacecraft Chamber of Horrors

Media Type:
Video

Running Time: 3m 39s
Size: 21.1 MB

or

Download

  • SAVE TO FOLDER
  • Share |
This media asset is from "NASA's Spacecraft Chamber of Horrors"/NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center.

Resource Produced by:

WNET

Collection Developed by:

WGBH Educational Foundation WNET

Collection Credits

Collection Funded by:

NASA

This NASA video explores the engineering and performance tests NASA spacecraft undergo prior to launch. Topics include g-forces, vibration, acoustic power, physical load, tension, EM waves, and thermal fluctuations – all presented in a whimsical tone that portrays the battery of tests as a “chamber of horrors.”

open Background Essay

Scientists and engineers often work on the same teams and think about similar questions, but scientists and engineers are guided by different (but related) processes. The Scientific Process has an engineering analog - the Engineering Design Process:

  • Identify the need or problem
  • Research the need or problem
  • Brainstorm possible solutions
  • Select the best possible solution
  • Construct a prototype
  • Test and evaluate the solution
  • Communicate the solution
  • Re-design based on information gathered

For a satellite or an instrument heading into space, testing and re-design are especially critical because, once launched, a satellite can’t be easily repaired or re-designed. That’s why NASA engineers subject all space-bound instruments to a wide variety of engineering tests. Some of those tests include g-forces, vibrations, acoustic/sound, EM interference, and extreme temperature change.

G-forces arise when an object (or a person) undergoes an extreme acceleration, like speeding up or braking in a car or whipping around a turn so fast you’re pinned to the wall. When you get pushed back into your seat while taking off in an airplane, you’re experiencing increased g-force. Some roller coasters subject riders to forces greater than 5g – even more than a rocket launch. When g-forces arise, objects can be compressed, stressed, ruined and deformed.

During liftoff and launch, vibrations travel through the launch vehicle and the payload bay where a new instrument might be cradled. Though installed securely and precisely, the instrument still experiences the transmitted vibrations, so engineers must run vibration tests to see if the materials and parts are durable enough. Though sound isn’t visible, its effects can be very powerful – and sometimes destructive. Sound waves, after all, transmit energy. Loud, prolonged sound can impact sensitive instruments, disrupt calibrations, and even cause physical change. Another variable that engineers consider when testing an instrument for space-readiness is EM interference. Without the security blanket that is our atmosphere, instruments in space must be able to function in radiation environments very different than those on the ground. Sensors, receivers, communication devices, and the physical frame must hold up to intense radiation testing. One of the most destructive forces a space-based satellite or sensor can face is wild fluctuations in temperature. Extreme temperature changes – melting to freezing and back again – can quickly deform or decay materials, interfere with electrical properties, and cause cracks or breaks.

When engineers design a system or an object, the process will always include some kind of testing, the results of which will feed back into ongoing phases of design improvement - until the product is optimized for use.


open Discussion Questions

Before
  • When engineers design something, how do they know if it will work?
  • Imagine if you knew you were traveling over a bridge based on an innovative new design approach that had never been tested? How would you feel?
  • What kinds of tests do you think would be important to run on a satellite about to be launched into orbit?
  • During
  • What are some of the testing environments NASA uses?
  • What safety precautions do you notice test engineers taking while they’re conducting the tests?
  • Of the tests described in the video, which condition do you think is hardest to replicate on Earth? Why?
  • After
  • What happens when an instrument or sensor “fails” a test? What’s the next step?
  • What are some ways engineers can tell what’s going on inside a sealed test chamber?
  • How do you think the battery of tests would be different if the sensors were going deep into the ocean instead of into space?

  • open Teaching Tips

    Design Critics

    Students break into groups and choose an object to test and critique – cell phone, laptop bag, backpack, etc. (If supplies are available, students can design and build a new object to test and critique.) Groups create a list of two or three parameters they will test and discuss. Students outline the tests they will perform and how they will measure results. Then they conduct the tests in their groups. Based on their results, students come up with re-design recommendations they would make before a future round of tests. Each group has a chance to present to the class and, if time allows, running additional tests with the whole class.

    Discussion Questions
    • Who do you think designed the object you’re studying?
    • What kinds of design decisions went into those choices?
    • Do you think end users like you were included in the testing process?
    • What factors do you think engineers had to balance when creating the object – i.e. size versus weight, durability versus price, etc.?
    • Think of some large-scale engineering projects that affect your everyday life –maybe a bridge, a tunnel, a skyscraper. How do you think those were tested? Do you think some of those tests used similar techniques as the ones you saw in the video?
    Additional Activity Idea

    Students collect a series of articles, radio pieces, podcasts, or other media segments that relate to or describe situations in which the engineering design process played a major role. Based on those, students create an overview piece – written or oral or video – to summarize the engineering “current events” they discovered. Questions: Were there some common threads through all the stories? What was the scale for each – small-scale nano, everyday, or large-scale? Were the topics newsworthy because of engineering successes – or because of failures? What were some common terms or vocabulary words you saw / heard in all the stories?


    open Transcript

    NARRATOR: Welcome to NASA's spacecraft chamber of horrors.

    Here spacecraft and components suffer through a grueling battery of tests, all in an effort to see if they are truly handle their mission and surviving the rigors of spaceflight.

    As this centrifuge whips them around, they experience the kind of G-forces or gravitational forces that they can expect to see on launch. Now, this centrifuge is not for human use. It can go up to 30 Gs which is way more than a human being can stand.

    They get shaken on any number of vibration tables to simulate the vibrations during launch.

    There is no sound in space, but the ride up can be noisy enough to break things.

    Inside this acoustics chamber, the instruments are blasted with noise in order to make sure they can survive the rocket trip to space.

    Some, like the new SLIC carrier, come here to the static load test facility. Some call it "the rack." Inside this frame, hydraulic actuators operated by a team of engineers push and pull the new composite payload carrier, testing it's ability to withstand the stresses of launch and re-entry. Based on the results from the 1000 strain gages placed on the carrier - it passed.

    In the Electromagnetic Interference test chamber, radio waves are blasted at the instrument to see if they any will disrupt its operations. The instruments are also tested to see if they produce any radio waves that could interfere with other instruments or systems.

    This is the Space Environment Chamber.

    Inside this enormous tank, spacecraft and instruments like the new Wide Field Camera 3 experience the harshness of space. The air is pumped out to simulate the vacuum of space and then the real testing begins. This chamber can heat to a blazing 300 degrees above zero Fahrenheit, and then drop to minus 310 degrees Fahrenheit. In here, the spacecraft must endure the huge temperature extremes it will experience in orbit, as it travels from full sunshine to the darkenss of Earth's shadow. A typical test can take many weeks.

    If the spacecraft survives the torture here, it's pretty much ready for space. If not, better it breaks here than after launch. Here we have the ability to understand the problem, correct it, and test again. All this testing helps reduce the risk of failure on orbit and increase the spacecraft's potential for scientific success.


    open Standards

     
    to:

    Loading Content Loading Standards

    open Comments and Reviews

    Not yet reviewed.