User:
Loading...This Teachers' Domain feature requires registration, which is simple, safe, and free.
"Program Reviews: Purpose, Process, and Practice: Module 3." Teachers' Domain. 29 Jul. 2011. Web. 18 May. 2013. <http://www.teachersdomain.org/resource/sbo10.prmodule3/>.
To embed citation, copy and paste the embed code above into your document.
Arts and Humanities Program Review
In 2010, a group of pilot schools conducted an earlier version of program reviews in a condensed three-month period. In this module, teachers and administrators from the schools that conducted reviews in arts and humanities share how they are using the program review to self-assess and set goals to improve their programs.
Videos illustrate characteristics of high quality teaching and learning that connect to all three program reviews. Refer to this list of Key Practices To Observe in Arts and Humanities (PDF) as you watch the videos to see how the instructional practices are represented in each program review.

Video: 2m 32s

Video: 3m 13s

Video: 3m 55s
THE ARTS AND 21st CENTURY SKILLS
In the first module, we learned that success in the 21st century requires a greater emphasis on creativity, problem solving, communication, collaboration, and innovation. Arts education plays a vital role in helping students develop those essential skills.
The first video on the left features Daniel Pink, author of A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future that was featured in Module 1.
The second video features a segment from the KET series Art to Heart on the role of the arts in schools. Educators and parents in Daviess County, Ky. acted on research on brain development and learning by giving each student lessons on a piano keyboard—and other arts opportunities—with outstanding results.
The final video features Dewey Hensley, then principal of Atkinson Elementary in Louisville, Ky., who talks about the unique role of the arts in teaching students living in high poverty.
OVERVIEW OF THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES PROGRAM REVIEW
The arts and humanities program review was developed through research-based best practices by arts education professionals in all four arts disciplines: drama, dance, music, and visual art.
Perhaps the most dramatic change in the way arts and humanities is assessed in Kentucky is the emphasis on balancing theory and content with opportunities for students to develop their talents by creating and performing. Arts and humanities content is still important, but it's not the only factor determining the quality of a school's program.

Video: 4m 43s
In the video on the left, teachers and a principal describe the benefits of program reviews in helping schools enrich instruction based on authentic, performance-based assessments versus content-driven paper/pencil tests. (Featured in the video in order of appearance: Dewey Hensley, principal, Atkinson Elementary, Louisville, Ky.; teachers from Silver Creek Elementary which piloted the Practical Living/Career Studies Program Review (left to right): Ryan Keller, 4th grade; Angela Sowers, guidance; Sandy Freeman, library media specialist; Paula Livinggood, Title I; teachers from Hayes Middle, Lexington, Ky. (left to right) Sara Francis, orchestra; Marlene Daugherty, speech/drama; Lois Wiggins, band; Stephen Bennett, visual arts).
As a reflection activity or for discussion in a larger group, describe your thoughts about the program review compared to the previous method of assessment.
Write your answer in the box below. After saving your notes, you can use the review my work link below and at the top of the lesson box to view your saved notes and print them.

Video: 1m 22s

Video: 4m 07s

Video: 2m 54s
ROAD MAP TO A QUALITY PROGRAM
In addition to emphasizing a balanced program in the arts and humanities—creating, performing, producing, and responding—the program review is raising the bar in other areas, including access for all, meaningful connections to other content areas, and steadfast support and monitoring from school leaders.
In the first video on the left, Dewey Hensley describes some of the ways Atkinson Elementary supports access to the arts for all students.
In the second video, Sherri Heise, principal of Hayes Middle School in Lexington, Ky., describes some of the school’s cross-disciplinary initiatives to improve access for all.
In the next video, Patrick Neace, who teaches arts and humanities at a Perry Co. middle and high school as well as directs the drama program at Perry County Central High School, describes ways in which Perry Co. provides arts and humanities instruction and experiences in a rural area.
As a reflection activity or for discussion in a larger group, consider the challenges in ensuring schoolwide access to the program review content areas.
Brainstorm some ways to connect program review and core academic areas.
Write your answer in the box below. After saving your notes, you can use the review my work link below and at the top of the lesson box to view your saved notes and print them.

Video: 6m 02s

Video: 2m 02s

Video: 2m 54s

Video: 2m 10s
COLLABORATION AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS
The second demonstrator in the program review under curriculum and instruction includes characteristics that address interrelationships among the four arts with other content areas. In the video on the previous page, Hayes Middle School Principal Sherri Heise described some of the challenges schools face meaningfully and intentionally integrating the arts in other content areas.
In the first video on the left, you'll see an example of high quality instruction in a lesson that connects music theory and science. Heather Lynd, science teacher at Atkinson Elementary, uses musical instruments to lay the foundation for a lesson on how sounds are made.
Conducting the program review created the impetus for the teachers in the arts at Hayes Middle School to work together to insure the curriculum is aligned vertically and horizontally. In the second video on the left, Hayes arts teachers describe their approach to cross-curricular planning and assessment. (Featured in the video from left to right: Sara Francis, orchestra; Marlene Daugherty, speech/drama; Lois Wiggins, band; Stephen Bennett, visual arts).
In the third video, visual arts teacher Beth Watkins of South Oldham Middle School in Crittenden, Ky., near Louisville, describes how she incorporates writing in her classroom as a powerful tool in facilitating reflective thinking. At the beginning of each class, students spend 5-10 minutes answering the following questions in their journals: Looking at the previous day's artwork, what were your successes, what problems did you encounter, and where might you go today with your artwork? Also featured in the video is South Oldham Middle's Literacy Coach Winn Wheeler.
In the fourth video, Tammy Duff, director of the Hazard Technical and Community College Greater Hazard Performing Arts Center, describes the ways in which the center supports P-12 arts and humanities programs in the region, including a popular annual event involving the Missoula Children's Theatre.
GETTING STARTED
The actual process for conducting an initial program review involves a committee conducting a review of every demonstrator, including identifying evidence, achieving a consensus on the school’s performance, supporting the judgments with a list of evidence, and making recommendations for improvement.

Video: 2m 15s

Video: 1m 16s
The videos on the left feature the program review committees at two schools that piloted an earlier version of the arts and humanities program review. They describe the process they used to conduct the review which they did over a condensed three-month period instead of the year-long approach for all schools.
Atkinson Elementary, located in Louisville, Ky.; Piloted arts and humanities; Valerie Watson, computer lab; Leslie Wooten, arts and humanities; Heather Lynd, science.
Hayes Middle School, located in Lexington, Ky.; Piloted arts and humanities; Featured in the video, left to right: Sara Francis, orchestra; Marlene Daugherty, speech/drama; Lois Wiggins, band; Stephen Bennett, visual arts.
As a reflection activity or for discussion in a larger group, consider the following question:
How has the program review process been done at your school in the past? What worked well and what could be improved on?
Write your answer in the box below. After saving your notes, you can use the review my work link below and at the top of the lesson box to view your saved notes and print them.


Video: 1m 14s
IDENTIFYING EVIDENCE
Evidence can come from multiple sources:
Some examples of evidence are unique to arts and humanities:
When you are analyzing the evidence, keep in mind what it should reflect for proficient and distinguished performance levels:
In the video on the left, teachers from Hayes Middle School in Lexington, Ky. talk about the types of evidence they identified when they were piloting an earlier version of the arts and humanities program review in 2010. (Featured in the video from left to right: Sara Francis, orchestra; Marlene Daugherty, speech/drama; Lois Wiggins, band; Stephen Bennett, visual arts).
YOU TRY IT
In this self-paced lesson, you will be practicing the process of conducting a program review by tackling one demonstrator. Open Arts and Humanities Program Review: Sample Page (PDF) Demonstrator 1. Student Access in the curriculum and instruction standard area.
Identify the evidence.
Complete the rubric.
Identify next steps.

Use the first box below to write your rationale. Include a list of evidence supporting your decision. In the second box, write your recommendations for improvement. After saving your notes, you can use the review my work links below and at the top of the lesson box to view your saved notes and print them.
Rationale and List of Evidence:
Next Steps:

RESOURCES
For principals, academic officers, and others who monitor and approve professional development credit, we have provided a list of the tasks required for each module. This provides an excellent opportunity for those monitoring and approving PD for credit to gauge participants’ engagement and understanding of the material.
Facilitator Guide for Module 3 (PDF)

MODULE 3 REVIEW
When you're ready, click the link below to open the review for Program Reviews Module 3. The review will consist of five questions. You need to answer at least four of the five questions correctly in order to get credit for this module.

Interactive
If you pass the quiz, you will be directed to an online survey about the module you just completed. At the end of that survey, click on the link to access a Certificate of Completion ready for printing. If you do not pass the quiz, you will be directed back to this module for a review of content.
If you have any technical problems or questions, please contact Brett Smith, KET Professional Development Division, 800-432-0951, ext. 7268 or bsmith@ket.org.
(Note: If you have trouble opening the survey, please disable the pop-up blocker in your browser preferences menu.)
Register now to download, share, and save
resources. It's simple, safe, and free! Learn More
You may view up to 7 resources in this limited trial period.
You have 6 views remaining. Register now for unlimited free access and to download, share, and save resources. Learn More
You have viewed all seven resources permitted in this limited trial period. You may continue to browse the site, but to view, download, share, and save resources, you must register now. Registration is simple, safe, and free.
As a user, you may browse Teachers' Domain and view as many resources as you wish without registering.
However, for access to all of the features of Teachers' Domain, we'll need a little more information. Learn More
Registering with Teachers' Domain is FREE and allows you to:
Learn about our online Professional Development Courses, or review our Privacy Policy.
If you still have questions, please contact us.
Welcome user:
Signing in now will connect your and Teachers' Domain accounts, so that in the future you will automatically be signed into Teachers' Domain when you come from .
Teachers' Domain, Program Reviews: Purpose, Process, and Practice: Module 3, published July 29, 2011, retrieved on ,
http://www.teachersdomain.org/resource/sbo10.prmodule3/
Media Type:
Self-paced Lesson
WGBH is trying to develop materials that better meet the needs of our users. Please take this brief survey to share how you use these resources and to provide feedback on your experiences using these materials. Take the Survey!
This module takes a closer look at the program review for arts and humanities, including an overview of the characteristics of high quality schoolwide arts and humanities programs, some specific demonstrators and characteristics from the program review, and videos illustrating exemplary practice.
Review Modules 1 and 2 for more information about the elements of program reviews, their purpose and goals, and the process for conducting them at your school.
To help improve this service, please report and describe any standards correlations that you find to be inaccurate.
Academic standards correlations on Teachers' Domain use the Achievement Standards Network (ASN) database of state and national standards, provided to NSDL projects courtesy of JES & Co.
![]()
We assign reference terms to each statement within a standards document and to each media resource, and correlations are based upon matches of these terms for a given grade band. If a particular standards document of interest to you is not displayed yet, it most likely has not yet been processed by ASN or by Teachers' Domain. We will be adding social studies and arts correlations over the coming year, and also will be increasing the specificity of alignment.
You must be signed in to see standards matches for your state.
Loading StandardsMajor funding for Teachers' Domain was provided by the National Science Foundation.
Teachers Domain® Home | Change Edition
About Teachers' Domain | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Teachers' Domain: © 2002-2013 WGBH Educational Foundation | shopPBS Educational Media