Not yet registered?Register now to download, share, and save resources. It's simple, safe, and free! Learn More You are now "Test Driving" Teachers' DomainYou may view up to 7 resources in this limited trial period. You have 6 views remaining. Register now for unlimited free access and to download, share, and save resources. Learn More About Registration:Registering with Teachers' Domain is free and allows you to:
Thank you for "Test Driving" Teachers' DomainYou have viewed all seven resources permitted in this limited trial period. You may continue to browse the site, but to view, download, share, and save resources, you must register now. Registration is simple, safe, and free. For more information:Learn about our online Professional Development Courses, or review our Privacy Policy. If you still have questions, please contact us. |
Resource: Documenting Brown 4: Mendez v. Westminster
Media Type:
PDF Document
Size: 80.8 KB
Also available from the "Brown Reactions" series:
- Background Essay
- Discussion Questions
- Standards
In the early 1900s, California's booming citrus industry attracted many Mexican immigrant workers. By 1920, the Mexican American population in southern and central California had tripled. Local governments, controlled by whites and supported by the "separate but equal" legal doctrine, reacted by instituting many forms of public segregation. Most school districts with a sizable Mexican American community had "Mexican" rooms in their schools or, more commonly, "Mexican" schools.
In 1945, Gonzalo Mendez and a group of other Latino parents, seeking to end school segregation, filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Los Angeles against four Orange County school districts: El Modena, Santa Ana, Garden Grove, and Westminster.
The plaintiffs, who were all citizens of the United States, alleged that the defendants had segregated students into separate schools solely because the children were of Mexican or Latino descent. They drew a distinction between discrimination based on race and that based on national origin. The defendants argued that schools were segregated because of language barriers and that non-English-speaking pupils should attend separate schools until they had acquired some proficiency in the English language.
The judgment was for the plaintiffs. The court found that the equal protection provision of the Fourteenth Amendment pertained to equal access to education, and that under this provision, segregation based solely on national origin was unconstitutional. Governor Earl Warren lobbied the California state legislature to enact legislation repealing the state's educational codes that allowed for segregation in public schools.
Produced for Teachers' Domain by:

Collection Developed for Teachers' Domain by:

Collection Funded by:



Loading Standards